Universal Truths in a Flat World

Friedman ultimately concludes that the underpinning of the “flat” platform for global collaboration is trust. America is currently ahead of the game because of the environment of trust that has been fostered over the years (see p.334). However, all players could lose the flat platform if enough people turn their creativity to evil purpose. “Nuclear terrorism … would unflatten the world permanently,” writes Friedman (p. 603).

What should we do about it? First, we should make a concerted, determined effort to stamp out nuclear proliferation. Second, we should make a concerted, determined effort to “influence the imagination and intentions” that cause terrorism and nuclear proliferation.

Will capitalist arguments be strong enough to win potential terrorists over? While certainly part of the answer, money is not the complete solution. The key message to instill and proclaim is the same message given to Moses, thousands of years ago: “Love the Lord thy God with all thine heart” and “love thy neighbor as thyself” (Deuteronomy 6:5; Leviticus 19:18).

If our god is money or world dominance, we will never achieve lasting benefits for ourselves or our children, on any platform. The true key to America’s success is loyalty to our founding virtues, and to the God of this land. We should use the global platform to help make life better for people here and everywhere; but we should also remember that we will lose all if we drift from our foundations.

Read a summary of the book: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_is_Flat

Connecting the World

Is it possible to connect the world? Genealogists think so. With new free software for merging family trees, Famillion provides a way for all the computing world to get it on the action. Everyone with access to a computer will have to answer the question: is our past our own property, or should we leap into the “global family forest?” For me and for most, I believe the costs are far outweighed by the benefits of belonging to a larger social network today and a larger family tree. And you?

Famillion in the news

Society matters

I feel that most women avoid computer science for the same reason that most men avoid the humanities. It is tough to be a minority. You have to believe in what you do more strongly than the majority does. Women who pursue computer science must have a passion for computer science strong enough to overcome the social pressures that come with entering a male-dominated field. However, if enough women decide to nurture their talents in computer science, there’s no reason that the social landscape and accompanying pressures couldn’t change for the next generation.

Where There’s a Will, There’s a Way

Computer security, it would seem, is always one step behind breaking computer security. The real issue is how responsible we will be with the information we put on computers and read from others’ computers. Where there is a clear, legal need to know, the best technology can and should be used to further the investigation. Where there isn’t, just be cautious about who and what you let into your hardware.

Researchers Find Way to Steal Encrypted Data

The Cuckoo's Egg: What Do We Conclude?

Before his ten-month tracking ordeal, Cliff Stoll believes in creative anarchy: loosely interpreted, people can do whatever they want. After all, hackers expose flaws in the network’s security and even inspire better systems. But after the long, emotionally draining journey, Stoll concludes that there are at least two severe drawbacks to hacker freedom:

1. Hackers sap the workforce of time and resources.
Just like a burglar who robs a small town, Stoll argues, a hacker costs the system time and resources. Responsibility for the loss obviously belongs with the hacker.

2. Hackers undermine confidence in a system that networks need to function.
At the outset, a hacker may have a fairly harmless motivation (such as curiosity), but even then, his findings will inspire other hackers. It is naïve to suppose that they will all be similarly kind-hearted. Indeed, as the example of Hess shows, the original hacker’s motives can easily change for the worse down the road.

A third reason is implied but not stated explicitly: Because 1 and 2 are wrong, hackers’ activities undermine the moral principle of accountability for one’s actions. If hackers really wanted to help create safer systems, they could report the bugs to systems designers, and people would call them testers and pay them money. In actuality, hacking stems from disrespect for others’ privacy and for the universal law of justice. By contrast, it was a genuine desire to vindicate justice that drove Stoll, Steve, Wolfgang, and others on, often with little appreciation for their efforts.

In hindsight, it is easy to be complacent about the end result. After all, the bad guys were caught. But there is a more important lesson: If it had not been for the exertions of good, capable people like Stoll, the hackers might never have been caught. These people realized that, more than just a network, justice itself was under attack.

So what do we conclude? As Stoll hinted, what the world needs is not more network cops, but more honesty. But what the world will get is up to our individual choice. For posterity’s sake, let’s hope we choose wisely.

Read a summary of the book:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cuckoo's_Egg_(book)

When Will We Grow Up?

The activities of Jack Thompson are an important step in the right direction. But why stop with the kids? Violence as entertainment is as degrading and morally destructive for a 10-year-old as it is for a 20-year-old. Consumers ought to unite on a personal and a government level to ban so called “mature” video games from homes entirely. After all, you’re never old enough to destroy yourself … or others.

Link to the article:
Suing the Suer: Video Game Company Sues Jack Thompson

Know Your Purpose

The primary purpose of both family history work and technology is to connect us with other people. This may be counterintuitive at first. After all, don’t genealogy and computers drive us into our own virtual reality apart from real people and real relationships? Not necessarily. For example, Marvin Zautcke and Lindsey* were able to expand their network of friends by being diligent genealogists. If we feel that family history work and technology separate us from other people, perhaps we just need to readjust our attitude towards them.

* Family History via the Internet.